| Re: [eigen] State of eigen support for small integers(16 bit, signed/unsigned) |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] State of eigen support for small integers(16 bit, signed/unsigned)
- From: Rohit Garg <rpg.314@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:12:15 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XDtfJQlfE55zj1vSloXl3vBPhg9P2zP8CbUK3EZ74PE=; b=AnPP1egp4UoTXkWvGdZvHjC8IdJGJoLsH3yQNGc/7S/uk2Q+IUCGTGMJbAVJRsDZnB HjtHfzPjoK9bI92h3dXMBxKhvHmHx5c2E50n6CeGX5NS4RNevQ3lqquPnx7+PiCUwpfD IjFuv0jmkmpEkWBp9oIWsaXP0EZt1Wkm2EtkA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UvX83MBmxCgja0rcN6PGWOD2gfN8HymHB7PhC2dguVZSflaZlCTvbU5EzkJv/3tIgB cB67n3FuSBOnGaVtM5kYOdmTVpDevDXa1Gg4jopC/BJeRmcF8jDTMqgG6kaDwmKlfsM7 0Mz+bB1Ue1eGugfIk1Ym6X7794bXaS4q898Zc=
> It's not clear to me yet where this should end -- should we:
> 1) put the short int types with the others and the bitwise ops in Array
>
> or
>
> 2) start a new module SmallInts and put all that there ?
Since I need this feature RIGHT NOW, which way would be shorter?
--
Rohit Garg
http://rpg-314.blogspot.com/
Senior Undergraduate
Department of Physics
Indian Institute of Technology
Bombay