| Re: [eigen] Eigen binary I/O proposal |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Eigen binary I/O proposal
- From: Rohit Garg <rpg.314@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:01:11 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=I3Bis8C/CjTm9Nx9Azh3HbgZXsvzBJqIIyX7k2suIzk=; b=o/lqKaaIAoh+QFsBDOVMtJFdCWgBqXiVc+4ndK5iWpF6kpHYUOuyGS+tnVuI9Ry9+g LRMkxxhSAeYSrsdDvNGar1U1s1AbOO0m57O8K+mqFOtbl+DHr80TzaconzXCwbUlLRBz 8CaMrYT4TmlULF3zsymBvns+jzatUkjewl+Ag=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WJkfl5nWsydPWExbZCZ0yr7R+P94+SDPdQSuE7ziiBEbuBRBhiVioJgJaukWZVqIbj sDAfDMMFVQaXSPqgkkm32rFkhTGGem/lQerO/R4YRA+R+SBswjOcpNcuQ9dLUix3kun+ KVvBs26N3W358bUlN8/8/Ctvd91WvLCmydwSs=
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Mark Borgerding<mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It seems like there is a desire for as many "flavors" of persistence as
> there are applications
:)
> We could either try to come up with a common interface that allowed all of
> them or treat each as a special case, completely separable from the others.
Common interface for all of them, Oh no, definitely not.
> I may not understand all the issues, but in general I would recommend the
> latter -- treat the different methods individually.
Sounds good to me.
--
Rohit Garg
http://rpg-314.blogspot.com/
Senior Undergraduate
Department of Physics
Indian Institute of Technology
Bombay