[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: "Trent Gamblin" <trent@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [AD] No more GNA
- From: "Trent Gamblin" <trent@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:52:25 -0700
- Cc: Allegro Developers <allegro-developers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nooskewl.ca; s=google; t=1488732746; bh=XYKylZlFUuoYr3/ccBg2VVxvyWgDm6fHfU2dednrxzE=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:From; b=Jes8NvLDFHSshsReqJcdBcrAh5MEuH4DjcSEtSv1rnX44cEyYVSmHKKo04JVKfxfW 8jZ/g3lXe7fHvgvTgTSOh1ZXzTidhMd7ReKc/d/Hp8cr4RRBW5gtV3dMGFdgd/E0hk Ufiq+eaNQEFWhcerMtLz6xz+vZH4ZnC/xQXI/hF4=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nooskewl.ca; s=google; t=1488732745; bh=XYKylZlFUuoYr3/ccBg2VVxvyWgDm6fHfU2dednrxzE=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:From; b=odwh5B1E+82obiqrTvQbPMCv4EDUzXkHSFYIkr0NHdEyydB+miVoxFDo5lrCBivIp r/3r0YY2TeMWJesdovUif49u09UZ3UQ/lpMM0xFqxu82C4hcrGKyzV59dcJPSIbjTO NnfYBtJ5dBWtaQrwN0UxCgRLkQpVSk2GGaU+tJqA=
Actually I just read they had been doing it again in 2015... probably best
to avoid SourceForge. Too bad there are so few options for mailing lists.
Maybe just putting the archive online somewhere would be good enough?
GitHub is kind of lacking in discussion areas though isn't it... issues
aren't exactly the same thing.
On Sun, March 5, 2017 9:35 am, Trent Gamblin wrote:
> Or if SourceForge is not tampering with files, just put them there...
>
> On Sat, March 4, 2017 4:25 pm, Trent Gamblin wrote:
>> On Sat, March 4, 2017 3:42 pm, SiegeLord wrote:
>>> Here are our download stats these days:
>>>
>>> http://stats.gna.org/download.gna.org/allegro/
>>>
>>> E.g. for the month of January we had a max of 1740 file downloads per
>>> day totaling about 2GB. I tried downloading a file right now and got
>>> about 184 KB/s, which suggests to me that our bandwidth requirements
>>> are
>>> somewhat low (and gna doesn't really give us good speed to begin with).
>>>
>>> 2GB is also about how many files we have in total at this time.
>>>
>>> -SL
>>
>> Sounds like we could easily get by on 100 Mbit then. Maybe even less.
>
>
>
>