| Re: [AD] SF.net SVN: alleg:[12523] allegro/branches/4.9 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 21:01 +1000, Peter Wang wrote:
> On 2009-08-27, Elias Pschernig <elias.pschernig@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> That's the standard terminology, though, and I don't like the ALLEGRO_AUDIO
> suggestion. In the documentation we can say "sample values" when talking
> about the units.
Well, it still is unfortunate naming. We could name it ALLEGRO_SOUND
(like e.g. Flash and XNA do). ALLEGRO_SAMPLE[_INSTANCE] is fine of
course, but since we can rename it... :)
>
> Actually, this seems okay to me:
>
> ALLEGRO_AUDIO_STREAM
...
> al_*_audio_stream_*
...
> which follows in the footsteps of Allegro 4. You might remove the
> underscore between AUDIO_STREAM, though I don't have any justification.
>
> Then we could use a _stream suffix, e.g.
>
> al_load_png_stream(ALLEGRO_FILE *stream, ...);
>
Sounds good to me.
--
Elias Pschernig <elias@xxxxxxxxxx>