| Re: [AD] SF.net SVN: alleg:[12071] allegro/branches/4.9 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On 14 Apr 2009, at 9:28 , Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
There is a reason I asked for input a long time ago. All these
sudden changes
are a bit of a shock. Why was it fine before and now its somehow
broken?
Don't take it personally.
You implement something and at some point you (or someone else)
realises that there's a reason to change it - so they change it at
that point.
No one will be used to allegro's api, so they shouldn't find a
different, more sane ordering /bad/.
The order is completely arbitrary (there is no reason one order should
be better than another, but it does somewhat depend on what you're
used to), so I would say the best thing to do is go with whatever the
"standard" convention is. Otherwise it gets confusing.
Evert