| Re: [AD] SF.net SVN: alleg:[12071] allegro/branches/4.9 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On Tue April 14 2009, Peter Wang wrote:
> On 2009-04-14, Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue April 14 2009, tjaden@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > Revision: 12071
> > > http://alleg.svn.sourceforge.net/alleg/?rev=12071&view=rev
> > > Author: tjaden
> > > Date: 2009-04-14 12:34:59 +0000 (Tue, 14 Apr 2009)
> > >
> > > Log Message:
> > > -----------
> > > Order (ptr, size) argument pairs conventionally in fshook functions.
> >
> > I don't see the point in this at all. Why is your way more convenient?
> > IMO the size should come before the data. I thought we wanted to get away
> > from emulating the broken interfaces in libc.
>
> More *conventional*. I've never seen size,ptr anywhere, ever. And it's
> not broken.
And yet other things I tried to import from other libs was broken?
There is a reason I asked for input a long time ago. All these sudden changes
are a bit of a shock. Why was it fine before and now its somehow broken?
No one will be used to allegro's api, so they shouldn't find a different, more
sane ordering /bad/.
> Peter
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--- This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
> Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
--
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx