Re: [AD] acodec questions

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: Coordination of admins/developers of the game programming library Allegro <alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AD] acodec questions
From: Milan Mimica <milan.mimica@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:56:55 +0100

Matthew Leverton wrote:


2) Why is acodec a separate add-on from kcm? It seems like a combined
allegro-audio.dll would be sufficient since they are essentially
mutually dependent. I think audio in general should remain an add-on
as many people prefer to just use fmod (etc), but I don't really see
the need for the split between the two. (Philosophically, yes there's
a difference between them, but I don't see how it's practical.)

My question is why would you merge them? Works fine as it is. Might not be verypractical, but it's a minor issue. We should focus on fixing things, and changeslike this are likely to break something.



--
Milan Mimica
http://sparklet.sf.net

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] acodec questions
  - From: Ryan Dickie

References:
- [AD] acodec questions
  - From: Matthew Leverton

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] colors addon
Next by Date: [AD] [ alleg-Feature Requests-2300978 ] Standard builtin colors
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] acodec questions
Next by thread: Re: [AD] acodec questions

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/