Re: [AD] 4.9 on MSVC 2008

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


On July 11, 2008, Elias Pschernig wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 04:28 -0600, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > Its mainly used to make sure all symbols are in the same place and order
> > they were in previous and future dlls. dll's are indexed by a simple
> > integer under the hood, so if a symbol changes places, its not going to
> > be found in the right spot. Or at least that's how I understood it. (all
> > new symbols are appended to the end, none are removed, and none move)
>
> I think we switch to symbol lookup - I guess it was a slight performance
> advantage 10 years ago, but I doubt it can make a measurable difference
> today. Of course, assuming DLL linking/loading can be made to do symbol
> lookup, and someone can figure out how to do it..
>
> Compatibility with existing .exes expecting to load the .dll with symbol
> lookup is no problem with 4.9 - so now would be the perfect time to
> change. But well, I'm assuming a lot of how things works, I have no idea
> about DLLs. Google suggests though that the lookup-by-index we are
> apparently using is only an optional feature.

I wasn't aware that Win32 PE-COFF DLLs were capable of anything more complex 
than lookup by index.

> --
> Elias Pschernig <elias@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
> Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
> along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
> and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08



-- 
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx




Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/