Re: [AD] Allegro 4.2.1 stress test

[Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wednesday 30 August 2006 4:40 pm, Elias Pschernig wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 17:13 +0200, Elias Pschernig wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 22:30 +0200, Evert Glebbeek wrote:
> > > Anyway, archives are available at
> > >
> > > http://www.eglebbk.dds.nl/allegro/
> > >
> > > please stress test these! I won't release them publicly until it's
> > > confirmed to compile normally on all platforms*, to prevent a repeat of
> > > the `Allegro 4.2.0 doesn't work on DJGPP!' disaster.
> >
> > I noticed how exkeys and extrans would go to 100% CPU use, so committed
> > a fix. I'll now try compiling it on all the SF compile farm hosts and
> > see how well it does.
>
> Ok, the results:
>
> alpha-linux1 - Failed, see http://alleg.sf.net/compilefarm/alpha-linux1.txt
> amd64-linux1 - Failed, see http://alleg.sf.net/compilefarm/amd64-linux1.txt
> amd64-linux2 - Failed, see http://alleg.sf.net/compilefarm/amd64-linux2.txt
> openpower-linux1 - Success, see
> http://alleg.sf.net/compilefarm/openpower-linux1.txt ppc-osx1 - No route to
> host
> ppc-osx2 - No route to host
> ppc-osx3 - Failed, see http://alleg.sf.net/compilefarm/ppc-osx3.txt
> sparc-solaris1 - No route to host
> sparc-solaris2 -  No route to host
> x86-freebsd1 - Failed, see http://alleg.sf.net/compilefarm/x86-freebsd1.txt
> x86-linux1 - Success, see http://alleg.sf.net/compilefarm/x86-linux1.txt
> x86-linux2 - Success, see http://alleg.sf.net/compilefarm/x86-linux2.txt
> x86-netbsd1 - No route to host
> x86-openbsd1 - Failed, see http://alleg.sf.net/compilefarm/x86-openbsd1.txt
> x86-solaris1 - Failed, see http://alleg.sf.net/compilefarm/x86-solaris1.txt
>
> For alpha-linux1, I'll try to investigate the compile error. (What is
> alpha?)

Its a DEC cpu, RISC based server platform. I think its been 64 bit for ages.

> The amd64 only fail because no X11 is available it seems - I guess we
> have enough amd64 testing so this won't matter.
>
> For OSX, only "make install" failed, and that because I did not know how
> to specify a "configure --prefix" option for it so it tried to use
> system pathes.. I guess we have enough OSX testing anyway, so won't
> investigate this any further as well.
>
> Both BSDs report the same compile error, I'll try to investigate.
>
> For solaris, ./configure does not recognize gcc for some reason.. I
> suspect a bug in autotools rather than on our side (gcc is installed
> there) - so, no idea about this one. (Is solaris still used by anyone?)
>
> --
> Elias Pschernig
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
> Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642

-- 
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx