| Re: [AD] Allegro SVN mirrors. |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On Saturday 17 June 2006 2:02 am, Elias Pschernig wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 09:49 +0200, Evert Glebbeek wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 June 2006 07:39, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > > And with permission, I think any svk mirror can be used as a commit
> > > repo
> >
> > as
> >
> > > well, and can easily mirror all changes back to the main repo.
> >
> > I don't think this is a good idea. What if there are two commits to
> > different mirrors that conflict with eachother? How do you merge them?
> > Keep one to which changes are commited and sync the others to that.
> >
> > As an aside, does anyone know of SF's SVN is stable enough to use? If so,
> > should we switch back there?
I think thats probably a good idea. so far SF's svn has been good afaik.
> I'll ask BAF for an SVN dump and do a test-wise import to SF, just to
> see if this would be any problematic, and maybe also to compare
> performance.
>
> Current SVN seems really slow to me. E.g.
>
> svn ls http://svn.bafserv.com/svn/allegro/allegro
>
> takes over a minute and still displays nothing.
That would be because its down. yo.
> svn ls https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/allegrogl
>
> also takes several seconds, but still is much faster than bafserv.
>
> --
> Elias Pschernig
--
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx