Re: [AD] Allegro SVN mirrors.

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 09:49 +0200, Evert Glebbeek wrote:
> On Saturday 17 June 2006 07:39, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > And with permission, I think any svk mirror can be used as a commit repo 
> as 
> > well, and can easily mirror all changes back to the main repo.
> 
> I don't think this is a good idea. What if there are two commits to 
> different mirrors that conflict with eachother? How do you merge them?
> Keep one to which changes are commited and sync the others to that.
> 
> As an aside, does anyone know of SF's SVN is stable enough to use? If so, 
> should we switch back there?
> 

I'll ask BAF for an SVN dump and do a test-wise import to SF, just to
see if this would be any problematic, and maybe also to compare
performance.

Current SVN seems really slow to me. E.g.

svn ls http://svn.bafserv.com/svn/allegro/allegro

takes over a minute and still displays nothing.

svn ls https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/allegrogl

also takes several seconds, but still is much faster than bafserv.

-- 
Elias Pschernig





Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/