| Re: [AD] al_list_config_entries |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] al_list_config_entries
- From: Chris <chris.kcat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 03:05:55 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KwlMURJ40vvDRaU+ONvYGdjdiNMRZYeejL/gvONqLYp6HYWQ9RthpVWdl+Nkir+EONeQt9445lXTqjb0M1IDlyxZViKJM0WErYoFAP6kwEyQ6VTF6KcRKKqY3IL9y9KEoNXIQ5jSgYhfbWC9ZFELpRKwmmBk6NYX2JfskOhCoXc=
Michal Molhanec wrote:
I don't see any reason for rejecting VC++ 6. It's outdated C++ compiler,
but it is still extremely fast and comfortable IDE for plain C (IMHO
best plain C windows IDE). Allegro is written using plain C, so any
imperfection in C++ is irrelevant.
You could say the same about GCC 2.95. Does VC6 have C99 support?