| Re: [AD] sys_directx_trace_handler |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] sys_directx_trace_handler
- From: thomas fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 02:04:18 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oflOduSya++9a/GJP0Yi7x9UTTNyukiA1evB7gg2i2Q3V04ek7REKNOxlpNbaqtlHdMEhHANNLVmtWJvhto++7t92ElQ98ATSVS+qxhFFoZyg5qr1UpEJyhciiQDd4sdBVX2zR2jC2ziOoOegt7CteevExN6abobOvQa6To39Gs=
On 4/28/05, guilt <karthikkumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> vsprintf is OK, becase vsnprintf isn't unfortunately supported on MSVC and
> it's clones.. :/ Of course, buffer exploits aren't our concern... :) I'd
> great appreciate it if Allegro had it's own allegro_vsnprintf
> implementations, such as (google for it, rip the code, rename the function
> and add to the CREDITS ..)
you sure allegro doesnt have a uvsnprintf? besides, I said vasnprintf
:P and exploits are everyone's concern.
> P.S.: lolz.. gmail doesn't highlight code.. but it sure does support some
> clipboard HTML functionality :) I got this from the CVS view
>
--
Thomas Fjellstrom
http://www.strangesoft.net
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx