Re: [AD] sys_directx_trace_handler

[guilt <karthikkumar@xxxxxxxxxx>]

agreed that we have a do uvsnprintf .. then we'd have to modify the directx_trace methods to use these....

On 4/28/05, thomas fjellstrom < tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 4/28/05, guilt < karthikkumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> vsprintf is OK, becase vsnprintf isn't unfortunately supported on MSVC and
> it's clones.. :/ Of course, buffer exploits aren't our concern... :) I'd
> great appreciate it if Allegro had it's own allegro_vsnprintf
> implementations, such as (google for it, rip the code, rename the function
> and add to the CREDITS ..)

you sure allegro doesnt have a uvsnprintf? besides, I said vasnprintf
:P and exploits are everyone's concern.

>  P.S.: lolz.. gmail doesn't highlight code.. but it sure does support some
> clipboard HTML functionality :) I got this from the CVS view
>

--
Thomas Fjellstrom
http://www.strangesoft.net
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx

-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans!
Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net
Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey
Click here to start!   http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix
--
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alleg-developers

-- 
Karthik
http://guilt.bafsoft.net