| Re: [AD] Discussion on Allegro 4.2 on allegro.cc |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On Friday 06 August 2004 04:23, Peter WANG wrote:
> I agree. Personally I would like to see the input & event queue stuff
> from the a5 effort get integrated first. The design is already there,
> in one big chunk, so hopefully most of the interactions in the
> submodules it will have been sorted out in the space of one stable
> release.
I agree that this would be a sensible starting point. Didn't you already
have some code implemented (albeit in C++) for this?
> If you think about it, we're in a better situation than Shawn was when
> he started Allegro. We've got the benefit of working code that shows
> which parts are related to which other parts, and how.
Yes. I also think that while we should only break the API once between
*stable* releases, as long as it's WIP releases I think it's ok if the new
API can change, especially while we're in a transition phase and the old
API is still there.
Evert