Re: [AD] yield_timeslice

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] yield_timeslice
From: Chris <kcat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:58:06 +0000

Elias Pschernig wrote:

No, since if yield_timeslice gets deprecated or re-introduced with the
4.1.12 behavior, it would be replaced by al_idle throughout the Allegro
source. (That's the point of al_idle - making Allegro programs,
especially Allegro itself, not hog all the CPU when being idle.)


And the problem with that is...?

- Kitty Cat

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] yield_timeslice
  - From: Elias Pschernig

References:
- [AD] yield_timeslice
  - From: Elias Pschernig
- Re: [AD] yield_timeslice
  - From: aj
- Re: [AD] yield_timeslice
  - From: Ben Davis
- Re: [AD] yield_timeslice
  - From: Daniel Schlyder
- Re: [AD] yield_timeslice
  - From: Chris
- Re: [AD] yield_timeslice
  - From: Daniel Schlyder
- Re: [AD] yield_timeslice
  - From: Chris
- Re: [AD] yield_timeslice
  - From: Daniel Schlyder
- Re: [AD] yield_timeslice
  - From: Chris
- Re: [AD] yield_timeslice
  - From: Daniel Schlyder
- Re: [AD] yield_timeslice
  - From: Chris
- Re: [AD] yield_timeslice
  - From: Elias Pschernig

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] yield_timeslice
Next by Date: Re: [AD] yield_timeslice
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] yield_timeslice
Next by thread: Re: [AD] yield_timeslice

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/