[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
Chris:
> Which IMO would be fine if there's no way for the system in question to
> properly idle the program via rest. It may not be able to give up the
> CPU, but it's using as little of it as possible.
My point was that the #define you posted would make rest() recursive if
timer_driver::rest is NULL.
> On another note, Unix uses select() to yield. Surely it could use
> select() to rest and idle as well?
I don't see why not.
Kind regards,
Daniel Schlyder
--
http://bitblaze.com/