Re: [AD] dat tool save header patch

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: Allegro conductors <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AD] dat tool save header patch
From: Peter Wang <tjaden@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 10:42:44 +1000
Invalid-uucp-from: From tjaden@xxxxxxxxxx Fri Jul 26 11:11:35 2002

On 2002-07-25, Daniel Schlyder <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The attached patch modifies datedit.c:datedit_save_header() to add the
> standard ifndef/define/endif around the object defines. Is it ok?

Why is it necessary?  C preprocessors won't complain if you include the
same header multiple times.

References:
- [AD] dat tool save header patch
  - From: Daniel Schlyder

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: [AD] dat tool save header patch - second try
Next by Date: Re: [AD] About my load_sample patch
Previous by thread: [AD] dat tool save header patch
Next by thread: RE: [AD] dat tool save header patch

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/