Re: [AD] dat tool save header patch

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More Archives ]

On 2002-07-25, Daniel Schlyder <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The attached patch modifies datedit.c:datedit_save_header() to add the
> standard ifndef/define/endif around the object defines. Is it ok?

Why is it necessary?  C preprocessors won't complain if you include the
same header multiple times.

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+