Re: [AD] Mini-synchronization API proposal for 4.1.x

[xaviergonz@xxxxxxxxxx]

Be careful if you are going to use the pthread lib in windows, since that
would make
allegro dependant on its dll
(Btw, I still don't get something ;) are you discussing about how allegro
should implement threads internally or if it should use pthread lib or not?
The comment above of course goes
if the last is the right case =)


> > Recursive mutexes aren't POSIX.  However, they are part of Unix98.
> > Whether everything supports that is another matter.  There are
> > non-portable ways of getting recursive mutexes, too.
>
> Ha! Let's forget recursive mutex...i (???) then and stick with the pure
> POSIX thread API.