| Re: [AD] Mini-synchronization API proposal for 4.1.x |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
> Recursive mutexes aren't POSIX. However, they are part of Unix98.
> Whether everything supports that is another matter. There are
> non-portable ways of getting recursive mutexes, too.
Ha! Let's forget recursive mutex...i (???) then and stick with the pure
POSIX thread API.
> I dunno if recursive mutexi are *really* required, but I don't use threads
> that much.
I think they are not.
--
Eric Botcazou
ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx