Re: [AD] Proposal for small change in d_edit_proc() |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: "Allegro Conductors" <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [AD] Proposal for small change in d_edit_proc()
- From: "Matthew Smith" <matt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 18:36:37 -0000
>
> > While we're at it, maybe dp2 can point to two ints, the first specifying
> > the max number of bytes and the second the max number of pixels? This
> > can be useful if the text that is later going to be displayed somewhere.
>
> And a third one specifying the maximum number of points ? This can be
useful
> if the text is later going to be printed and you are a little stingy on
the
> ink for your ink-jet printer ;-)
>
Isn't d->w the maximum width in pixels :) ?
Actually I personally avoid d_edit_proc altogether because of its habit of
requiring the mouse to be over it to retain the focus, which I find annoying
Matt