Re: [AD] gcc 3.x workaround.

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: "Allegro conductors" <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AD] gcc 3.x workaround.
From: "Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 22:01:53 +0100

> Angelo and I also think this change should be rolled back.  The
> current gcc 3.x releases are not widespread yet, AFAIK.  A warning can
> be added somewhere in the documentation, or a configure-like test (but
> IMHO that's unnecessary).

I think we should have a care for this problem under Linux though. Attached
is a proposed patch.

--
Eric Botcazou
ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: linux_gcc_bug.diff
Description: Binary data

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] gcc 3.x workaround.
  - From: Peter Wang

References:
- [AD] gcc 3.x workaround.
  - From: Henrik Stokseth
- Re: [AD] gcc 3.x workaround.
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [AD] gcc 3.x workaround.
  - From: Henrik Stokseth
- Re: [AD] gcc 3.x workaround.
  - From: Peter Wang

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: RE: [AD] Proposal to drop DOS port from Allegro 4
Next by Date: Re: [AD] Proposal to drop DOS port from Allegro 4
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] gcc 3.x workaround.
Next by thread: Re: [AD] gcc 3.x workaround.

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/