| Re: [AD] gcc 3.x workaround. |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On 2001-11-30, Henrik Stokseth <hstokset@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Friday 30 November 2001 16:31, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
> > > i have removed all instances of -fomit-frame-pointer optimalisations from
> > > the makefiles in preparation for the stable release. please don't touch
> > > this.
> >
> > I disagree: the x86 platform is well-known for its scarcity of registers,
> > so having one less register to use may have significant performance hits.
Angelo and I also think this change should be rolled back. The
current gcc 3.x releases are not widespread yet, AFAIK. A warning can
be added somewhere in the documentation, or a configure-like test (but
IMHO that's unnecessary).
- Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
- Prev by Date:
Re: [AD] Proposal for a (refined) timetable
- Next by Date:
Re: [AD] CVS: allegro/include/allegro/platform al386gcc.h,1.2,1.3al386vc.h,1.2,1.3al386wat.h,1.2,1.3 alqnxcfg.h,1.4,1.5 alucfg.h,1.2,1.3
- Previous by thread:
Re: [AD] gcc 3.x workaround.
- Next by thread:
Re: [AD] gcc 3.x workaround.