Re: [AD] Proposal to drop DOS port from Allegro 4 |
[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]
Chris La Mantia wrote:
From: "Bob" <ohannessian@xxxxxxxxxx>That's not quite true: Total votes: 157 For DOS: 40% Dropped from Allegro 5 (against DOS): 19% Dropped from Allegro 4 (against DOS): 8% Yesterday (against DOS): 10% Total for/against: 40%/37%You missed 21% who say DOS should always stay in a limited form. That's 61% for DOS and 37% against.
I don't know about you, but I'm interpreting that option as being the we-dont-really-care or the it-would-be-really-nice-but-isn't-required camps, so this puts them more in the neutral position, IMHO.
-- - Robert J Ohannessian "Microsoft code is probably O(n^20)" (my CS prof) http://pages.infinit.net/voidstar/
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |