| Re: [AD] Proposal for first step towards new api |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On 2001-12-19, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Related question: is the 4.x line feature-frozen forever ? What if the 5.0
> release takes a long time to be rolled out, especially if we keep in mind
> Shawn's advice of doing it right the first time ? The 4.x line could benefit
> from new features (mini synchronization API) and new drivers (DirectInput
> joystick driver under Windows).
New features would go in 4.2.x, I think. Drivers could go in 4.0.x,
except for three little words in abi._tx (which I don't care about).
> > Also, would a separate CVS module for 5.0 be better than to branch off
> > 4.0?
>
> If we keep developing the 4.x line, I strongly think so.
Ok. I won't create the module yet until we know what we're going to
be doing, i.e. when most of the new API is finalised. <snicker>