| Re: [AD] Problems with gcc 3.1 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
> > Me praises for a day when Allegro will be prefixed and there won't be
> > more
> > tricky defines and more compatibility problems, just a uique and free
> > of name crash API =)
>
> and then all the functions should be al_function(...
>
> what a waste writing lots of useful al_ when u could not
Personally I like to write 3 letters more for each function instead of
having to use
#defines every here and there, taking care of the headers order or having to
use another header if i want to use the windows api as well.