Re: [AD] Problems with gcc 3.1

Re: [AD] Problems with gcc 3.1

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: "Allegro Conductors" <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AD] Problems with gcc 3.1
From: Javier González <xaviergonz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 02:37:38 +0200

Me praises for a day when Allegro will be prefixed and there won't be more
tricky defines and more compatibility problems, just a uique and free
of name crash API =)

> What does everyone think of it?  Will it work?  It does mean the user
> will have to include allegro.h before math.h on systems that have
> conflicts, but that's not _hopelessly_ bad.
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] Problems with gcc 3.1
  - From: salvador

References:
- [AD] Problems with gcc 3.1
  - From: salvador
- Re: [AD] Problems with gcc 3.1
  - From: Peter Wang
- Re: [AD] Problems with gcc 3.1
  - From: salvador
- Re: [AD] Problems with gcc 3.1
  - From: Peter Wang
- Re: [AD] Problems with gcc 3.1
  - From: salvador
- Re: [AD] Problems with gcc 3.1
  - From: Peter Wang

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] scroll_screen in X11 window mode
Next by Date: Re: [AD] CPU info changes
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] Problems with gcc 3.1
Next by thread: Re: [AD] Problems with gcc 3.1

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/