Re: [AD] official beta (Re namespace again)

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: conductors@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] official beta (Re namespace again)
From: Laurence Withers <lwithers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 03:55:00 +0000

In reply to Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>I don't get why people keep saying that the wips are more stable than 3.*.

Well, have you tried running 3.12 on Linux? :-)

>Every other commit or two there is a new bug added which does get fixed
>but alot of the time some bugs get sucked into a WIP release...

But how many bugs are there in 3.12?

Bye for now,
-- 
Laurence Withers, lwithers@xxxxxxxxxx
                http://www.lwithers.demon.co.uk/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] official beta (Re namespace again)
  - From: Thomas Fjellstrom

References:
- RE: [AD] official beta (Re namespace again)
  - From: Vincent Penquerc'h
- Re: [AD] official beta (Re namespace again)
  - From: Chris La Mantia
- Re: [AD] official beta (Re namespace again)
  - From: Thomas Fjellstrom

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] official beta (Re namespace again)
Next by Date: Re: [AD] official beta (Re namespace again)
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] official beta (Re namespace again)
Next by thread: Re: [AD] official beta (Re namespace again)

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/