Re: [AD] Problems with gcc 3.1

[salvador <salvador@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Peter Wang wrote:

> On 25 Oct 2001, salvador <salvador@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I don't know if this will solve gcc 3.1 case where the compiler
> > itself says the function is a *built-in* one. I didn't check it in
> > detail but the message implies that's a function the compiler knows
> > even when no header defines it. It looks like gcc treats it like
> > case, for, bool, etc.
>
> If you have gcc 3.1, can you test it please?  I don't see why `fsqrt'
> needs to be "built-in", whatever that means (ok, some optimisations
> could probably be had).

Ok, I'm putting it in my todo. I have a copy at home.

SET

--
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Visit my home page: http://welcome.to/SetSoft or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Alternative e-mail: set@xxxxxxxxxx set@xxxxxxxxxx
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA Phone: +(5411) 4759 0013