| Re: [AD] Problems with gcc 3.1 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On 25 Oct 2001, salvador <salvador@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I don't know if this will solve gcc 3.1 case where the compiler
> itself says the function is a *built-in* one. I didn't check it in
> detail but the message implies that's a function the compiler knows
> even when no header defines it. It looks like gcc treats it like
> case, for, bool, etc.
If you have gcc 3.1, can you test it please? I don't see why `fsqrt'
needs to be "built-in", whatever that means (ok, some optimisations
could probably be had).