Re: [AD] namespace collision

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: "Allegro Developer" <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AD] namespace collision
From: "Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 14:31:03 +0200

> In light of the problems with inline functions, I'm going to return
> to this proposal.  A possible patch is attached.

I'm ok with the patch, but why did you modify wddovl.c, wddraw.c, wgdi.c and
not wddwin.c ?

---
Eric Botcazou
ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] namespace collision
  - From: Peter Wang

References:
- Re: namespace collision (was: multithreaded callbacks (was Re: [AD] de fourium pointium ohium))
  - From: Bob
- Re: [AD] namespace collision
  - From: George Foot
- Re: [AD] namespace collision
  - From: Peter Wang
- Re: [AD] namespace collision
  - From: George Foot
- Re: [AD] namespace collision
  - From: Sven Sandberg
- Re: [AD] namespace collision
  - From: George Foot
- Re: [AD] namespace collision
  - From: Sven Sandberg
- Re: [AD] namespace collision
  - From: Peter Wang
- Re: [AD] namespace collision
  - From: Peter Wang

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] [TODO] About findfirst
Next by Date: Re: [AD] [TODO] About findfirst
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] namespace collision
Next by thread: Re: [AD] namespace collision

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/