Re: [AD] ouch! (reg. allegro beos port)

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


Angelo Mottola <a.mottola@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> About the BeOS Allegro port: I'm now using BeOS as my primary OS (writing
> this from there), and there have been a lot of changes to the port
lately -
> guess you never tried it before, as it is already completed and fully
working
> (maybe there are some minor things left)... Probably WIP 3.9.38 will have
> more changes on the BeOS port like it never had before, so you really
can't
> say it is unmaintained =)

i wasn't talking about just beos. the rsxntdj, watcom and the borland build
is currently unmaintained and unless they are fixed up before allegro 4.0
they should be removed from the actual release. there's a big chance that
rsxntdj and borland will still be there as both compilers are freely
available. the thing is with beos that it looks like it will slowly
disappear, and beos users are few.

> It should be clear now that I'm strongly against separating the BeOS port
> from the official Allegro 4 release. It would be a shame!

i have to agree. i guess beos will still be around for some more time. i had
more in mind separating out the mac port since large parts of it is not
finished. perhaps in a few years when beos and dos are extinct the same will
happen to those ports? or is that flame-bait? LOL.

Sincerely Henrik Stokseth.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
E-mail: hstokset@xxxxxxxxxx  Homepage: http://hstokset.n3.net




Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/