Re: [AD] I've made a modification to the set_gfx

Re: [AD] I've made a modification to the set_gfx_mode function

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AD] I've made a modification to the set_gfx_mode function
From: "Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 21:32:04 +0200

> To reserve the internal buffer for the user's use only.  Allegro
> library functions would have their own buffers.

I never thought of this problem but now that you're speaking about it...

> Yes, hidden side effects.  If Allegro functions were guaranteed not
> to destroy the internal buffer, I think `uconvert' would be a lot
> more convenient (for the user).

You're obviously right !

References:
- Re: [AD] I've made a modification to the set_gfx_mode function
  - From: eglebbk
- Re: [AD] I've made a modification to the set_gfx_mode function
  - From: Evert Glebbeek
- Re: [AD] I've made a modification to the set_gfx_mode function
  - From: Peter Wang
- Re: [AD] I've made a modification to the set_gfx_mode function
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [AD] I've made a modification to the set_gfx_mode function
  - From: Peter Wang

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] processor specific opimisations.
Next by Date: Re: [AD] processor specific opimisations.
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] I've made a modification to the set_gfx_mode function
Next by thread: Re: [AD] I've made a modification to the set_gfx_mode function

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/