| [frogs] Re: LSR snippets for contributors and Frogs |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: Valentin Villenave <v.villenave@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [frogs] Re: LSR snippets for contributors and Frogs
- From: Graham Percival <graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 04:05:20 -0700
- Cc: Mark Polesky <markpolesky@xxxxxxxxx>, John Mandereau <john.mandereau@xxxxxxxxx>, "Carl D. Sorensen" <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>, frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=G16B/s4WqCkTcXLyH78qc8VhSilrJuZ5NMRnXlucqhg=; b=ACAwdPHVUH2rvqujTgBmQm+dXgnw/z4hjWT3m9stnjn7LIrR8PDCLHRrtZLc4Wj80Y grXuLGgWBRZAZ87DAHJBOtP6njYTatFGwjYxy4Zjsloe1OTVTXAW6WJOFzVu24IH479z DroVuAg+pSaDYAFFKDkEXHAwEgt+4IIIOk1Mc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=OPE1oSgVsOorrXuRoTsdSfTFDmgjNKiWbxvZBHt3CZkPc/jNBg9mglYlHwUGTq/uxK PaJ7txkW3uFCxpQKe2qzX9uKcvrAh91WKTbDyUZtqejw1hxnUNNL0AZAlmPofaZp61+D PmKoa9nr2JNgubE7uir+5Xpt3ft3nj4bXHlnM=
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 12:42:41PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> > 2009/7/24 Mark Polesky <markpolesky@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> Sometimes I wish
> >> there was something like an LSRD (for developers). You know, snippets
> >> showing how to trace grob-parents, how to sort objects by specific
> >> properties, how to know when to use #'(0 . 1) and when to use
> >> #'(-0.5 . 0.5). These sorts of things.
> >>
> >> What's sorely lacking in my opinion is a good reference documentation
> >> for stuff like music-map, how to get a context from within a music-
> >> function, the difference between ly:font-design-size and
> >> ly:font-magnification, stuff like that. I'm learning all this stuff on
> >> my own but it's like swimming through JELL-O. In the dark. And I think
> >> there are a lot of useful functions that are totally undocumented (like
> >> make-sequential-music and its kin). Sometimes I'll find stuff totally
> >> accidentally, like lily-library.scm.
Advanced scheme stuff, huh?
> as Mark suggested, I have taken the liberty to add a new "devel" tag
> to the LSR. I can rename it to "frog" or "contributors" or whatever,
> but devel came to my mind first.
Really? "Advanced scheme" comes to _my_ mind first -- 3 or 4
years ago, when I made the very first list of categories (in the
pre-tag days). Now, I'm not certain if that tag still exists, but
whatever tag corresponds to NR 6 should be used for these scheme
things.
> (now I'll just wait for Graham's "this is a crappy idea" reply... :-)
This is a crappy idea.
Cheers,
- Graham
---
----
Join the Frogs!