| Re: [frogs] LSR snippets for contributors and Frogs |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: Valentin Villenave <v.villenave@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [frogs] LSR snippets for contributors and Frogs
- From: Graham Percival <graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:13:57 -0700
- Cc: Mark Polesky <markpolesky@xxxxxxxxx>, Trevor Daniels <t.daniels@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Neil Puttock <n.puttock@xxxxxxxxx>, frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx, John Mandereau <john.mandereau@xxxxxxxxx>, "Carl D. Sorensen" <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>, Patrick McCarty <pnorcks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=2zBDUiGL5Cmi7cJ3FkCqH2Lvsl89ZIZD3g+DbIF6gxM=; b=En+6QelgCUWGy0ZmRA+IC1P4M74U1ZFiWRLbA0SBCRB56ZirQn/x1JSlawa1qg3WSl m8tDStbtHtwEh158g+PKGlE4FIg57TaR6FKHF1tYl68xavcVm7VUBOVF6f5mELh9Bu/j 2Y3dH6uj0Gk9crUITYpJzPgNeQuyO1mFD+/XU=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=if71oRccRMbadufZuhPM7Exd7722hxs924HVFJ8HeH6RJCxC6lqMUROuICpaqGNx2N nfAvge6pTgYbFlhc6sZjHyrn4sukPMyWshE2m1hcZkxy9FnyewRlXSe9GEkOHLCnexpR MiYAUkEXO0f7WqX42Cb34g+5SRkmO8njjj310=
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:08:47AM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2009/7/26 Mark Polesky <markpolesky@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> > 3) I can't modify my own snippets in the snippet database.
> >> > Known issue or do I need to e-mail Seba?
>
> This is bevause as soon as Neil or I mark a snippet as Approved, we
> need to edit it and therefore become the new snippet's author. If you
> have something to change after the snippet has been approved, all you
> can do is contact Neil or me, or add it as a new snippet and add
> "[correction]" to the title.
BTW, this is a feature, not a bug. Otherwise, I could get an
innocent snippet approved, then change it to include my favorite
security flaw.
Now, I'm not saying that I wouldn't trust Mark with LSR admin
status if he wanted. But as a general rule for non-admins, this
is definitely a good feature.
Cheers,
- Graham
---
----
Join the Frogs!