| Re: [chrony-users] refclock local with OCXO |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-users Archives
]
- To: chrony-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [chrony-users] refclock local with OCXO
- From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 12:59:13 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1688036356; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dfxCSOaCVGyqNrJhaUhUyGz/Zdr7h8sKm7OUvJE93WA=; b=Qgn/vE7da+Pxe2YBPsGfRaMMIp8/2zkj1gX1vlsLa1WYCSSpFpHNVaCQjLAEiYSVrOaYeZ KzH4zSE4LX97++6Y1gWWh+/Fqke7e23htaoiLzd3B1yGcS3uq3vk1QM29fyDObLLL1K5Ly lD5cjvHULznjLFPRygTZq4+WNflPZx8=
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 10:45:20AM +0200, Stephanie Wilde-Hobbs wrote:
> Thank you very much, this seems to be what I want! Is the time period over
> which the OCXO is assumed stable controlled by minsamples/maxsamples?
That would the other sources' minpoll/maxpoll, minsamples/maxsamples
and filter configuration.
For the OCXO refclock you need to consider stability of the system
clock and the noise in the measurements. It should have the shortest
interval among all sources.
--
Miroslav Lichvar
--
To unsubscribe email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
For help email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "help" in the subject.
Trouble? Email listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.