| Aw: Re: [chrony-users] How to use Facebook's NTP-service correctly? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-users Archives
]
- To: chrony-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Aw: Re: [chrony-users] How to use Facebook's NTP-service correctly?
- From: "Lars-Daniel Weber" <Lars-Daniel.Weber@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 16:41:27 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1586270488; bh=ujij4EX2AUpaemysIJv6G+aQg1q+se3PR5KbLOYZJX0=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=apuCmxXm75boTXD8As2+LmqmcB0tdywIK2zCS00N8wZayqyccYs7snmnmOdxafmDI jIrWUAnapktInWIa/JsQPqVNvMlaHvnXdo3wNyvWLIbSfYRxYHw+DHzZ71AoLjp4u+ 8HwhbhD/5jXVOcoWjDu059U4FZe7VOjXGwPUXRdk=
- Sensitivity: Normal
Miroslav wrote:
> Each of the names resolves only to a single pair of IPv4 and IPv6
> address, so I think they should be specified using the server
> directive rather than the pool directive. I guess using iburst is ok
> as most public servers are ok with that.
Okay, then I've setup it correctly.
> Please note that they have enabled leap smearing, which means they
> are incompatible with everything else.
But is this not to be interpreted as an advantage? Since Chrony can do
leap smearing (in contrast to systemd-timesyncd or ntp), this should
be a good combination, right?
Or do you mean, I cannot mix it with other NTP services. Google's time
service also does leap smearing, I think.
> BTW, the servers don't seem to be actually running chrony. I think they
> use it only internally.
True. But because of the leap smearing, I think it's best to use Chrony.
--
To unsubscribe email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
For help email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "help" in the subject.
Trouble? Email listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.