Re: [chrony-users] Re: GPS performance tuning of `offset` |
[ Thread Index | Date Index | More chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-users Archives ]
On 2/4/19 6:10 pm, Miroslav Lichvar
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 03:09:55PM +1100, Brendan Simon (eTRIX) wrote:Just want to know which is the correct approach to set the refclock `offset` parameter. Out of the values in the table below, should I use the minimum, maximum, average or something else?The average would be best, but usually it doesn't matter much.Are there any consequences if I use too small or too large a value? eg. 0.3 v 0.4 or 0.5If the SHM 0 refclock is used only for locking a PPS refclock, then it just needs to be accurate enough to reliably lock the PPS. If it will be used as the primary time source, a too small or too large value will have a negative impact on the average error of the clock. I'm using SHM 0 as the primary time source, so I will use the average as suggested. I haven't been able to get PPS going on my system (using either SHM 1 or SOCK). I will revisit it that at some point in the future. Thanks, Brendan. |
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |