| Re: -EXT-Re: [chrony-users] Using symbolic network names in /etc/chrony.conf file? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-users Archives
]
- To: chrony-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: -EXT-Re: [chrony-users] Using symbolic network names in /etc/chrony.conf file?
- From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 09:04:53 +0200
- Authentication-results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
- Authentication-results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx
- Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com B723BC058ECA
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 06:36:26PM +0000, Parker, Michael D. wrote:
> BTW, I have use this format in specifying network ranges in IPTABLES
> without a problem (EX: -A INPUT -s mynetwork/16 -j ACCEPT where my network
> is defined in /etc/hosts) ...so this type of syntax is a known quantity and
> the action is generally understood.
Ok, so there is at least one program which accepts such syntax.
However, from the man page I have a feeling the mask was supposed to
work only with IP addresses.
[!] -s, --source address[/mask][,...]
Source specification. Address can be either a network name, a
hostname, a network IP address (with /mask), or a plain IP
address. Hostnames will be resolved once only, before the rule
is submitted to the kernel. Please note that specifying any
name to be resolved with a remote query such as DNS is a really
bad idea. The mask can be either an ipv4 network mask (for ipt‐
--
Miroslav Lichvar
--
To unsubscribe email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
For help email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "help" in the subject.
Trouble? Email listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.