Re: [uruk] Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 (Beta-1)

[Dave Hunt <dahunt@xxxxxxxxx>]

Here's the update log you requested; hope it helps!

Having fun and being free,

Dave  H.

dave@lilbuddy:~$ clear

dave@lilbuddy:~$
dave@lilbuddy:~$ sudo apt update
[sudo] password for dave:
Hit:1 http://packages.urukproject.org lugalbanda InRelease
Hit:2 http://ppa.launchpad.net/jonathonf/gcc-7.1/ubuntu xenial InRelease      
Get:3 http://linux-libre.fsfla.org/pub/linux-libre/freesh freesh InRelease [2,497 B]
Hit:4 http://es.archive.trisquel.info/trisquel flidas InRelease               
Hit:5 http://es.archive.trisquel.info/trisquel flidas-security InRelease
Hit:6 http://es.archive.trisquel.info/trisquel flidas-updates InRelease
Err:3 http://linux-libre.fsfla.org/pub/linux-libre/freesh freesh InRelease
  The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 9D0DB31B545A3198
Reading package lists... Done
W: http://packages.urukproject.org/dists/lugalbanda/InRelease: Signature by key F094C518D6F659B7783F25866B3C79D5138BA0FE uses weak digest algorithm (SHA1)
W: GPG error: http://linux-libre.fsfla.org/pub/linux-libre/freesh freesh InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 9D0DB31B545A3198
E: The repository 'http://linux-libre.fsfla.org/pub/linux-libre/freesh freesh InRelease' is not signed.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.
dave@lilbuddy:~$

On 08/31/2017 06:58 PM, alimiracle@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Next, I tried an update/upgrade sequence.  There was a problem with a public key for the
linux-libre repository, so, that will no longer update.  More as I use this for a while.

can you send the update log??
h