Re: Slitaz vs DSL

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives ]


+1 with Brenton

2012/5/10, Brenton Edgar Scott <trixarian@xxxxxxxxx>:
> *Sigh* This is like comparing Ubuntu to Arch and equally productive.
> DSL had Debian as an back-end and it's developers didn't have to lift a
> finger to fix half the issues we have to. Modern these days is using a
> properly configured xorg that automatically generates the configuration
> every boot and a system that uses udev exclusively (and left HAL
> behind). 99% of the libraries DSL used has bloated a big and probably
> tripped in size by now. The playing field isn't even anymore.  This is
> half why I get so pissed off when people compare SliTaz with other
> distros. I think the only fair comparison would be TinyCore and then
> only barely. Puppy had years to adapt to the proper way of doing
> things, it's creator is pretty clued up and with it's current large
> user/developer base it's pretty up to date. Arch has the same advantage
> and all the others are based on some pretty distros. We don't have that
> luxury and we're still learning.
>
> So please instead of comparing or complaining, rather use that energy
> into helping us conform the standards and teaching us how to use xorg,
> the linux kernel and udev effectively.
>
> --
> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
>
>


-- 
Lamkomsel,
TML

http://www.ajinalo.com

-- 
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/


Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/