Re: Slitaz vs DSL

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives ]


its really redicolous to compare DSL with slitaz - sorry, dsl-n is from
2006 and the last dsl 4.0 from November 2008

take slitaz 3.0 xvesa and it will boot on your hardware and be happy -
its still much more up to date than dsl 4.0

and by the way dsl-n was always a catastrophy

Thomas



Am Wed, 9 May 2012 15:45:06 +0700
schrieb AjiNalo <ajinalo@xxxxxxxxx>:

> none of DSL version work on my machine (old Pentium IV 1,6 GHz)...
> 
> 2012/5/9, Terry Maiden <t.maiden@xxxxxxx>:
> > Was going thru a bunch of old CDs I made some time ago.  Found
> > several that had Damn Small Linux on them.  The last "3" version
> > and the last "4" version.  I was shocked how quick and easy they
> > were to load and run.  Much faster than the latest versions of
> > Puppy and faster than Slitaz (sorry). Both had good versions of
> > Firefox and both came up 1024x768 without my having to do anything
> > to get that.
> >
> > --
> > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> >
> >
> 
> 


-- 
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/


Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/