[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
- To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Slitaz vs DSL
- From: AjiNalo <ajinalo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 15:45:06 +0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=JBpeyyY3Rdgve5DBwIH2JImFsR+HqgVZi6zhvvy3Qfw=; b=HzMtgObl91zkafNFaNfSlq8xvbLmz2Ux3ryaa+as80Od7TnWb5/Ak+TJNLLKk46nLh zfgF+mHT91ZL0aKigxrRVjGxnnx7JtE9mbznMNRO8Nbx4+YxegSOQarhWbQRzD954Awh /Bbq7ar/gMnM2jI7QOXr71w7RLLx9w4295zjfsxX6alNIPrlNq0U36olv6Boy8/N3PTB 4vzgiGBaC9tAoBU0o6++ahrjZPgOAzyDIkeMSF4Eab1zNVVVNz4+EXC5RKmQQqlUCiKt 3ecfVjUjzQB89Ck7DxpkeRhURNz8kr78lO4Mc2KL74jTga26WfzjC7pDNnZ6bS0l3gQ4 mJ4Q==
none of DSL version work on my machine (old Pentium IV 1,6 GHz)...
2012/5/9, Terry Maiden <t.maiden@xxxxxxx>:
> Was going thru a bunch of old CDs I made some time ago. Found several that
> had Damn Small Linux on them. The last "3" version and the last "4"
> version. I was shocked how quick and easy they were to load and run. Much
> faster than the latest versions of Puppy and faster than Slitaz (sorry).
> Both had good versions of Firefox and both came up 1024x768 without my
> having to do anything to get that.
>
> --
> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
>
>
--
Lamkomsel,
TML
http://www.ajinalo.com
--
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/