[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
- To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Slitaz vs DSL
- From: Allan Pinto <allan316@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 16:27:31 +0530
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5PEErtv4mobdLv8bu498aaq1EybZ0TufjX69SPMConM=; b=adXw7+r5N8HqnAUK6tK/IGJt3KJV1uoIJJR7K5sW2wBBSPx1/PDoJVB+Th9s3NdNoe ThZX/Ds0LCptDgzucYl1goRSG3plM6FEZRG9HalylFCAhpEy/Kbme/s/+0+MD4CN8VWO LPzFcLnut51AotSzdc5dMKK41efoWuFbNF2N+tO1oTVi/co8qSuKFYlljhHPj4jvJdDk yU4ko13e8LyTLBtiq2MTpBmTGuD4CHsWnh63N9v6a1QmSBCZEVPzNdKqD5PqBbSFAFxI uTC1F+SaViod3SZLK/uTv/O8PVUQzqq+d4GXSoxqlfcoOns7I0Iv3EsQLCf50DXT1OAR lhFw==
what was the kernel, if i remember correctly i dont think they ever
migrated to 2.6 which could be one of the reasons for a faster bootup.
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Terry Maiden <t.maiden@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Was going thru a bunch of old CDs I made some time ago. Found several that had Damn Small Linux on them. The last "3" version and the last "4" version. I was shocked how quick and easy they were to load and run. Much faster than the latest versions of Puppy and faster than Slitaz (sorry). Both had good versions of Firefox and both came up 1024x768 without my having to do anything to get that.
>
> --
> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
>
--
Thanx and regd's.
Allan.
http://openbullet.com
--
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/