| Re: 4.0 or not ? Cookiso, website, doc |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
- To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: 4.0 or not ? Cookiso, website, doc
- From: Ikem Krueger <ikem.krueger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 20:18:03 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=aJhAb2Ppig75hNgx98+GSjHzKH9nMSxj5b/9690MO8k=; b=0VXCqP6nPhQ93qOAsc/aKxwDIYAres3NgCwT++vOBAk/nKMAPtnbXgU8tpxs61wATD UYOj6m1EMg3Xh1oEIu9IzENBtXC65tvU0fnxxmEakJpBRH22tkTjQQIaIJ2xqXBad7kb D1BEiofmmFEZSELXeyLWxdf6GYvkyvkYeoZEZpVD9fuxIAsTg/75COdndQQOVaKpPwV8 mqv1WX13Ck4WHiRFfaP+NVts+b+QfgGLqFdemGu+3DYIU5qtRQoZ6pLZlHoiDSxrW2Ki zHlihNqe1MX6veoBQNmnEHlPm6+5Ff9gy8qpLJRsahDKeNHg3+f7iXb7LMjVmu4Eu2gn Ndig==
> 2012/3/17 Christophe Lincoln <pankso@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Any suggestion or opposition to publish 4.0 as it?
> Or do we delay 4.0 again?
For me "4.0" means in a working state.
There are some bugs which really need to get fixed before:
* boot menu: http://bugs.slitaz.org/issue117
* dependencies: http://bugs.slitaz.org/issue126
* artwork: http://bugs.slitaz.org/issue122
* browser: http://bugs.slitaz.org/issue120
And I suggest to roll back to the RC1 openbox/gtk theme.
It looked a way more appealing.
--
My blog: http://linux-workers.posterous.com/
--
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/