| Re: 4.0 or not ? Cookiso, website, doc |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
- To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: 4.0 or not ? Cookiso, website, doc
- From: Mariusz Wojcik <mdickie007@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 22:00:30 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VIw6wakI5BZPToQVrTucPbqdRvJXI7p1SogN6fi2zRY=; b=L7+urDaUWA8PhF3ItweDTZ87kqrz61tdq0HKQEuuZOZsGoqnoAwGwTdboQFVN2ihdt nKol1L1f2qdAYXT4ccl70DOVKwTkUukKtDUqa5M3Gp3zs0rKpB0y2SWgJqgCsgbgzTsn ub6n332VNnRbM7KvJrQDI6zfVtuiN0ScAILe/J9YJq3fIN7TIZ3WUoNhwrizktDUve66 JXHsV5QLdw0qWWbbawESLjKfEAx3Tba37d4HUsAPZaULGIvGVoBlyFLwfJcnAYU3obrj o+cuaPaSWJ+x6Pj+dMvst88e1/bPLxhnidQbctjSziUyxAs8dV47GSN2UwGs32ST6mFg x19Q==
Am 2012-03-17 21:18, schrieb Ikem Krueger:
2012/3/17 Christophe Lincoln<pankso@xxxxxxxxxx>:
Any suggestion or opposition to publish 4.0 as it?
Or do we delay 4.0 again?
For me "4.0" means in a working state.
There are some bugs which really need to get fixed before:
* boot menu: http://bugs.slitaz.org/issue117
* dependencies: http://bugs.slitaz.org/issue126
* artwork: http://bugs.slitaz.org/issue122
* browser: http://bugs.slitaz.org/issue120
And I suggest to roll back to the RC1 openbox/gtk theme.
It looked a way more appealing.
Yeah, I don't tested SliTaz 4.0rc but I want know if my Bug
http://bugs.slitaz.org/issue92 from slitaz 3.0 is solved? and will be an
upgrade script to migrate to the new version?
--
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/