Re: Tazlito with Kernel from latest cooking

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives ]


Hi,

> what is the error it gives you when it fails?
the kernel aborts with some messages about threads and helpers,
I fear I'm not really confident with that kernel stuff, here
are the last lines, that are shown on the screen:

[<c016080c>] ? alloc_vmap_area+0x168/0x197
[<c0114df4>] bad_area_nosemaphore+0xd/0x10
[<c011500a>] do_page_fault+0xe1/0x1de
[<c0114f29>] ? do_page_fault+0x0/0x1de
[<c0423b4d>] error_code+0x6d/0x74
[<c05v9342>] ? unlzma+x0xcfa/0xe8e
[<c0101546>] ? fill_buffer+0x0/0xa9
[<c05a2cf2>] unpack_to_rootfs+0x1ee/0x303
[<c05a2830>] ? cpio_flush_buffer+0x0/0x8a
[<c05a2659>] ? error+0x0/0x13
[<c05a2e07>] ? populate_rootfs+0x0/0x229
[<c05a2e5e>] populate_rootfs+0x57/0x229
[<c05c8067>] ? af_unix_init+0x0/0x47
[<c019a4a2>] ? proc_net_fops_create+0x1a/0x1f
[<c03e9645>] ? unix_net_init+0x31/0x4b
[<c039c6fa>] ? register_pernet_operations+0x13/0x15
[<c039c7d3>] ? register_pernet_subsys+0x28/0x2d
[<c0101139>] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x13a
[<c05a12db>] kernel_init+0x106/0x157
[<c05a11d5>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x157
[<c01038e7>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10


In the meantime I found something else: on an old box with
only a single core there doesn't seem to be that issue!
However I can reproduce the error on at least two different
dual-core systems.

So maybe it is related to the multicores and threads interfering
with each other?

In any case this seems to be very strange.

Thanks a lot for your reply!
Harald


> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Harald Klimach <klimach@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> >> A pure core flavor seems also to work with the newest kernel. Maybe there is
> >> a limit to the ramfs size or something in the new one? I am trying to track
> >> this down right now.
> > I can't really put a finger on this. It indeed seems to be related to the
> > size. For example something like this already fails:
> >
> > tazlito get-flavor core
> > echo vim-7.2 >> distro-packages.list
> > tazlito clean-distro
> > tazlito gen-distro
> > tazlito gen-flavor core
> >
> > This is not fixed to vim, but also happens with other packages of sufficient
> > size. Anybody experiencing something like that with cooking?

---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/


Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/