| Re: [Sawfish] installing sawfish in xubuntu |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/sawfish Archives
]
- To: sawfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Sawfish] installing sawfish in xubuntu
- From: greg heil <emanuensis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:25:52 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=MOXra+USJUOhh3RVwSUy8gC4lo6an24JfWsH+9GEMhU=; b=xHUgd2w4uR26FAHilHiXq8WG/O2h/WK4M1t1m/i9N4YQf40/kcOffErPXL8MPN7hw2 wOaXsETAWvtN5D2S9JgExwbZXAZK844hAfUo5f0hb7NYLDRkR5snm/4KwlYngxf3N3QP dtmWn3vXqV0gSyBokbdZkHMfmYL5+jEiJqt6xX3mTiNzaXEj8KuMPvPHSwaKpvgiAAUg 5DqC7YYnIKqFF7bT/282eZvbXTT9CLWzc/3aQEZuBe/lZnxBo6ReCIxKkHgnyDeCXX/s LP3tyKxCSGchUFnLOIjjO06o1v4O9L289hhCYOxj+Cm6Ch3S/izciyjrE1noSV5ntRWN bjuA==
Chris
Well that could be good for me ... the machine IS a (duo) 64b! How do
i convince Synaptic of that though? i believe at install i used the
32b option instead.It would be rather misteak prone to do a direct
install, especially as i do not know, yet, how to do that properly.
greg
~krsnadas.org
--
from: Christopher Roy Bratusek nano@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
to: sawfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
date: 24 August 2012 01:33
subject: Re: [Sawfish] installing sawfish in xubuntu
Ahh... my repo only has AMD64, no i386. But you could download the
sources and compile from those (since it's deb-src it will tell you
about missing deps)
Regards
--
from: greg heil emanuensis@xxxxxxxxx
to: sawfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
date: 23 August 2012 17:39
subject: Re: [Sawfish] installing sawfish in xubuntu
Chris
Synaptic failed to install Sawfish saying:
"Could not apply changes! Fix broken packages firs."
Perhaps it is because when i updated the package list a dialog said:
GPG error: http://apt.nanolx.org photonic InRelease: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
available: NO_PUBKEY 4B9D3375057549E2Failed to fetch
http://apt.nanolx.org/dists/photonic/main/binary-i386/Packages 500
Internal Server Error Some index files failed to download. They have
been ignored, or old ones used instead.
BTW the Starfish-pager is not marked as coming from nano...
greg
~krsnadas.org
--
Sawfish ML