Re: [Sawfish] installing sawfish in xubuntu

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/sawfish Archives ]


Run "uname -a" once to check your installed version.

I'm not sure if you can install 64bit software on a 32bit system.

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 07:25:52AM -0700, greg heil wrote:
> Chris
> 
> Well that could be good for me ... the machine IS a (duo) 64b! How do
> i convince Synaptic of that though? i believe at install i used the
> 32b option instead.It would be rather misteak prone to do a direct
> install, especially as i do not know, yet, how to do that properly.
> 
> greg
> ~krsnadas.org
> 
> --
> 
> from:	 Christopher Roy Bratusek nano@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> to:	 sawfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> date:	 24 August 2012 01:33
> subject:	 Re: [Sawfish] installing sawfish in xubuntu
> 
> Ahh... my repo only has AMD64, no i386. But you could download the
> sources and compile from those (since it's deb-src it will tell you
> about missing deps)
> 
> Regards
> 
> --
> 
> from:	 greg heil emanuensis@xxxxxxxxx
> to:	 sawfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> date:	 23 August 2012 17:39
> subject:	 Re: [Sawfish] installing sawfish in xubuntu
> 
> Chris
> 
> Synaptic failed to install Sawfish saying:
> 
> "Could not apply changes! Fix broken packages firs."
> 
> Perhaps it is because when i updated the package list a dialog said:
> 
> GPG error: http://apt.nanolx.org photonic InRelease: The following
> signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
> available: NO_PUBKEY 4B9D3375057549E2Failed to fetch
> http://apt.nanolx.org/dists/photonic/main/binary-i386/Packages  500
> Internal Server Error Some index files failed to download. They have
> been ignored, or old ones used instead.
> 
> BTW the Starfish-pager is not marked as coming from nano...
> 
> greg
> ~krsnadas.org
> 
> -- 
> Sawfish ML
> 

-- 
Sawfish ML


Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/