RE: [Sawfish] Sawfish usage poll |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/sawfish Archives
]
- To: sawfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [Sawfish] Sawfish usage poll
- From: Allin Cottrell <cottrell@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 08:37:54 -0400 (EDT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wfu.edu; s=google; h=date:from:x-x-sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=fRSCha3+gioNOKrS1AU4sJ2hjCn2OsMICK2Sah9qWR4=; b=HQn91SZJ8OipgjX9mm8dGpAnxN3rLLcx/efYXkGmpqe6n65cqRCGlTTrFH0Dz8MtNM 2/L1smJyheS9Ohfcoa+q/e7NvXqMPD8LNoX12EM1lD8TV/nE62+X/iIsGza1rgeghl7f DyVc6foTfoFFHGqK8adtdjOk68FGTnN6Entjs=
I don't use any of the four features mentioned in the
questionnaire.
The features of sawfish that I value the most, and that are
not found in other WMs (or not at all easily) are
* The ability to set specific WM treatment of individual
programs or classes of program. E.g. I like an analog clock
and run xclock; with Sawfish I can prevent xclock from being
decorated with title bar and so on, which looks stupid and
ugly.
* The ability to make particular programs start on specified
virtual desktops. You can do this (sort of) with metacity plus
devilspie, but it's much clunkier than sawfish.
* The ability to define root-window popups with ease: I like
having middle-mouse bring up a task list.
* And I've probably forgotten a few other nice things that I
take for granted with sawfish, and whose absence makes me
curse when I'm forced to use another WM.
Allin Cottrell
lurker
---
--
Sawfish ML